Cheshire East Council (25 005 777)

Category : Education > Special educational needs

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 25 Sep 2025

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We cannot investigate Mrs X’s complaint that the Council failed to arrange a suitable school placement or alternative educational provision for her child. These matters overlap with a SEND Tribunal appeal about her child’s Education, Health and Care Plan.

The complaint

  1. In February 2025, the Council issued a final Education, Health and Care Plan (EHC Plan) for Mrs X’s child, Z.
  2. Mrs X complains the Council:
      1. failed to name a suitable school in Section I of the Plan; and
      2. failed to arrange a suitable education for Z, including the special educational provision, since issuing the Plan, despite Z being unable to attend school.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. The Local Government Act 1974 sets out our powers but also imposes restrictions on what we can investigate.
  2. We cannot investigate a complaint if someone has appealed to a tribunal about the same matter. We also cannot investigate a complaint if in doing so we would overlap with the role of a tribunal to decide something which has been or could have been referred to it to resolve using its own powers. (Local Government Act 1974, section 26(6)(a), as amended)
  3. The First-tier Tribunal (Special Educational Needs and Disability) considers appeals against council decisions regarding special educational needs. We refer to it as the SEND Tribunal in this decision statement.

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information provided by the complainant and the Council.
  2. I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. We cannot investigate Mrs X’s complaint about the Council’s decision not to name a school in Z’s EHC Plan or failure to arrange the provision in Z’s Plan. Mrs X has appealed to the SEND Tribunal about the school placement and provision specified in the Plan. We cannot look at the consequences of the Council’s decisions either. This includes Mrs X’s complaint that Z was missing educational provision, as well as the provision in Section F, as Z was unable to attend school. The alleged fault in the Council’s decision-making is directly linked to Mrs X’s appeal. Any dispute over provision while Z was not in school is linked to Mrs X’s appeal about the provision in the Plan and the school placement. We have no power to look at any complaint that overlaps with a SEND Tribunal appeal.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We cannot investigate Mrs X’s complaint that the Council failed to arrange a suitable school placement or alternative educational provision for her child. These matters overlap with a SEND Tribunal appeal about her child’s Education, Health and Care Plan.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings