Cheshire West & Chester Council (25 004 468)

Category : Education > Special educational needs

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 17 Sep 2025

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We will not investigate X’s complaint about the Council’s failure to sign a contract for their child, Y’s, school which meant they missed out on four transition half-days. This is because the Council apologised, offered a symbolic payment, and an investigation is unlikely to achieve a different outcome.

The complaint

  1. X complained the Council:
      1. failed to communicate with their child, Y’s, school which meant Y missed out on transition days; and
      2. failed to follow its complaints process.
  2. X said the matter caused them distress, frustration, and time and trouble.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. We investigate complaints about ‘maladministration’ and ‘service failure’, which we call ‘fault’. We must also consider whether any fault has had an adverse effect on the person making the complaint, which we call ‘injustice’. We provide a free service, but must use public money carefully. We do not start an investigation if we decide the tests set out in our Assessment Code are not met. (Local Government Act 1974, section 24A(6), as amended).

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information provided by the complainant.
  2. I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

Background

  1. X has a child, Y, who has special educational needs (SEN). In September 2024 Y was scheduled to take part in four half-days as part of their transition into their school. However, a delay occurred because the Council did not sign the relevant contact. This meant Y could not attend the transition days.
  2. X complained to the Council.
  3. The Council responded to X and apologised. It explained the reason for the delay in signing the contract. It offered X a £100 symbolic payment to recognise the frustration and uncertainty caused by the delay.
  4. X complained to the Ombudsman. They said the Council’s complaint responses were delayed and the £100 remedy was not sufficient.

Analysis

  1. We will not investigate X’s complaint about the Council’s failure to sign the relevant contract in time for Y to attend four transition half-days.
  2. The Council already apologised and offered a £100 symbolic payment in recognition of the distress and frustration caused. An investigation by the Ombudsman is unlikely to achieve any additional outcome.
  3. We will also not investigate X’s complaint about the Council’s complaint handling. This is because it is not a good use of public resources to investigate complaints about complaint procedures, if we are unable to deal with the substantive issue.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We will not investigate X’s complaint because an investigation is unlikely to achieve a different outcome.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings