Suffolk County Council (25 002 315)

Category : Education > Special educational needs

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 15 Jul 2025

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We cannot investigate this complaint about the Council’s decision relating to an Education, Health and Care Plan for Mrs X’s child. This is because Mrs X appealed the decision to the First-tier Tribunal and the law does not allow us to investigate.

The complaint

  1. Mrs X complained about the Council’s decision to change her child’s Education, Health and Care (EHC) Plan. Mrs X also complained about the costs incurred from medical reports.
  2. Mrs X complained that this caused them stress, and she had to take a significant amount of time off work.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. The Local Government Act 1974 sets out our powers but also imposes restrictions on what we can investigate.
  2. We cannot investigate a complaint if someone has appealed to a tribunal about the same matter. We also cannot investigate a complaint if in doing so we would overlap with the role of a tribunal to decide something which has been or could have been referred to it to resolve using its own powers. (Local Government Act 1974, section 26(6)(a), as amended).
  3. The First-tier Tribunal (Special Educational Needs and Disability) considers appeals against council decisions regarding special educational needs. We refer to it as the Tribunal in this decision statement.
  4. Some parents will incur significant legal and expert fees during the appeal process. We cannot investigate this as the Tribunal has powers to consider and/or award costs as part of the appeal. (The Tribunal Procedure (First-tier Tribunal) (Health, Education and Social Care Chamber) Rules 2008/2699, Rule 10) 

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information provided by the complainant and the Council.
  2. I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. Mrs X complained about the Council’s decision to make changes to her child’s EHC Plan. Mrs X used her right of appeal to the Tribunal about this decision.
  2. The law is clear that when a parent has appealed to a tribunal, the matter appealed, or anything closely linked, such as the decision-making process, is outside our jurisdiction. We have no discretion in this matter. This exclusion includes any costs Mrs X incurred.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We will not investigate this complaint because Mrs X appealed the decision to the First-tier Tribunal and the law does not allow us to investigate.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings