Summary: We have upheld this complaint about the Council’s failure to complete an Education Health and Care Needs Assessment for the complainant’s child within the statutory timescale. The Council has agreed to provide a proportionate remedy and this removes the need for us to investigate.

The complaint

1. The complainant, Mr X, complains that the Council has failed to complete his child’s Education Health and Care Needs Assessment (EHCNA) and issue an Education Health and Care (EHC) plan within the timescale set out in the Special Educational Needs Code of Practice.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

2. We investigate complaints about ‘maladministration’ and ‘service failure’. In this statement, I have used the word fault to refer to these. We must also consider whether any fault has had an adverse impact on the person making the complaint. I refer to this as ‘injustice’. If there has been fault which has caused significant injustice, or that could cause injustice to others in the future we may suggest a remedy. (Local Government Act 1974, sections 26(1) and 26A(1), as amended)
3. Under our information sharing agreement, we will share this decision with the Office for Standards in Education, Children’s Services and Skills (Ofsted).

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

4. I considered information provided by the complainant and the Council.
5. I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

6. Mr X requested an Education Health and Care Needs Assessment for his child. The Council initially declined the request but subsequently agreed to assess. The process was delayed by seven months. The Council issued a final EHC plan in June 2025, and an amended final EHC plan in August 2025.
7. The evidence shows that the delay can be attributed to the lack of education psychology resource. The Ombudsman regards delay in assessing education health and care needs due to the lack of specialist advice as amounting to service failure. We are satisfied that the Council has a plan in place to address the lack of specialist advice.
8. If we were to investigate this complaint it is likely we would find fault causing Mr X injustice because of the distress and uncertainty caused by the delay.

Back to top

Agreed action

9. We therefore asked the Council to, within one month of the date of this decision, offer to make a symbolic payment of £700 to Mr X in recognition of the delay in issuing the EHC plan. To its credit the Council has agreed to take the action we asked for. This removes the need for us to investigate

Back to top

Final decision

10. We have upheld this complaint. The Council has agreed to resolve the complaint early by providing a proportionate remedy to the injustice caused to Mr X.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman