Milton Keynes Council (24 021 155)

Category : Education > Special educational needs

Decision : Upheld

Decision date : 20 May 2025

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We will not investigate Mr X’s complaint about delays in producing an Education Health and Care Plan as the Council has agreed to a proportionate way to resolve the complaint.

The complaint

  1. Mr X complains the Council avoidably delayed in assessing and producing an Education Health and Care Plan (EHC Plan).

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. We investigate complaints about ‘maladministration’ and ‘service failure’. In this statement, I have used the word fault to refer to these. We provide a free service but must use public money carefully. We may decide not to start or continue with an investigation if we are satisfied with the actions a council has taken or proposes to take. (Local Government Act 1974, section 24A(7), as amended)
  2. Under our information sharing agreement, we will share this decision with the Office for Standards in Education, Children’s Services and Skills (Ofsted).

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information provided by Mr X and the Council.
  2. I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. Mr X complains about a delay in issuing an EHC Plan. His child, B had an EHC Plan. B was due to start the next phase of education in September 2024. This means their EHC Plan should have been amended by 15 February 2024. It was not until 17 July 2024. Mr X then appealed to the Tribunal.
  2. If we were to investigate it is likely we would find fault causing the complainant injustice because the Council failed to meet the EHC Plan regulations and this delayed Mr X’s appeal rights.

Back to top

Agreed action

  1. The Council has previously set out to us its action plan to deal with the problems it has with EHC Plan delays.
  2. The Council has agreed to a symbolic payment of:
    • £500 to reflect the delayed appeal rights injustice of uncertainty and frustration.
  1. This is a suitable remedy for the frustration and uncertainty caused by the delay.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We have upheld this complaint because the Council has agreed to resolve the complaint early by providing a proportionate remedy for the injustice caused to Mr X.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings