Surrey County Council (24 019 791)

Category : Education > Special educational needs

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 08 Apr 2025

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We cannot investigate Miss X’s complaint about how the Council has managed her child’s education provision. This is because she has used her right of appeal to the SEND Tribunal.

The complaint

  1. Miss X complains about how the Council has managed her child’s education provision. She feels the Council should name a different school on her child’s Education Health and Care (EHC) Plan. She also complains about how the Council has communicated with her about these matters.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. We investigate complaints about ‘maladministration’ and ‘service failure’, which we call ‘fault’. We must also consider whether any fault has had an adverse impact on the person making the complaint, which we call ‘injustice’. We provide a free service but must use public money carefully. We do not start or continue an investigation if we decide any injustice is not significant enough to justify our involvement. (Local Government Act 1974, section 24A(6), as amended, section 34(B))
  2. We cannot investigate a complaint if someone has appealed to a tribunal about the same matter. We also cannot investigate a complaint if in doing so we would overlap with the role of a tribunal to decide something which has been or could have been referred to it to resolve using its own powers. (Local Government Act 1974, section 26(6)(a), as amended)
  3. The First-tier Tribunal (Special Educational Needs and Disability) considers appeals against council decisions regarding special educational needs. We refer to it as the Tribunal in this decision statement.

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information provided by the complainant and the Council.
  2. I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. I cannot investigate the contents of Miss X’s child’s EHC Plan, including the school named in the plan. This is because Miss X has used her right of appeal to the SEND Tribunal which prevents us from investigating it. We also cannot investigate the education provision in place whilst the Tribunal considers the appeal. This is because this is not separable from the appeal itself.
  2. Miss X also complains about poor communication from the Council. However, whilst I acknowledge that this causes a certain level of frustration, this alone has not caused Miss X a significant enough injustice to warrant investigation by the Ombudsman.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We will not investigate Miss X’s complaint because she has used her right of appeal to the SEND Tribunal

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings