Hertfordshire County Council (24 019 456)

Category : Education > Special educational needs

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 09 Apr 2025

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We cannot investigate this complaint about The Council not naming the right provision for Mrs X’s child on an Education Health and Care Plan. Mrs X has used her right to appeal to the Special Educational Needs and Disability Tribunal and we cannot act in an auxiliary role by recommending further remedy or the reimbursement of legal costs.

The complaint

  1. Mrs X said the Council failed to listen to her and did not name a specialist residential college on the Education Health and Care (EHC) Plan at the time of phase transfer. She wanted the Council to apologise to her child and to reimburse her legal costs.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. The Local Government Act 1974 sets out our powers but also imposes restrictions on what we can investigate.
  2. We cannot investigate a complaint if someone has appealed to a tribunal about the same matter. We also cannot investigate a complaint if in doing so we would overlap with the role of a tribunal to decide something which has been or could have been referred to it to resolve using its own powers. (Local Government Act 1974, section 26(6)(a), as amended)
  3. The First-tier Tribunal (Special Educational Needs and Disability) considers appeals against council decisions regarding special educational needs. We refer to it as the Tribunal in this decision statement.

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information provided by the complainant.
  2. I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. The Council first issued a final EHC Plan for Mrs X’s child in February 2024. Although the Council later issued a further final Plan, her right to appeal to the SEND Tribunal dates from February 2024. The Tribunal upheld Mrs X’s appeal in October 2024 and her child started at the specialist college Mrs X wanted in December 2024.
  2. Mrs X’s use of her right of appeal means we cannot consider matters subject to the appeal, or the time taken in holding the appeal after the right became available. And we cannot act in an auxiliary matter to the Tribunal by making further recommendations about legal costs or an apology.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We cannot investigate Mrs X’s complaint because she has used her right of appeal to a Tribunal, and we cannot act in an auxiliary role by making recommendations about further remedy.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings