London Borough of Lewisham (24 019 036)

Category : Education > Special educational needs

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 01 Apr 2025

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We cannot investigate Mrs X’s complaint about the naming of a school in her child’s Education Health and Care Plan. This is because Mrs X used her right of appeal to a tribunal, and the issues she has raised are not separable from that appeal.

The complaint

  1. Mrs X complains about the Council’s decision-making process in its naming of a school in her son’s Education Health and Care (EHC) Plan. Mrs X says her son was out of education for 15 months.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. The Local Government Act 1974 sets out our powers but also imposes restrictions on what we can investigate.
  2. We cannot investigate a complaint if someone has appealed to a tribunal about the same matter. We also cannot investigate a complaint if in doing so we would overlap with the role of a tribunal to decide something which has been or could have been referred to it to resolve using its own powers. (Local Government Act 1974, section 26(6)(a), as amended)
  3. The First-tier Tribunal (Special Educational Needs and Disability) considers appeals against council decisions regarding special educational needs. We refer to it as the Tribunal in this decision statement.

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information provided by the complainant.
  2. I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. The Council carried out a review of Mrs X’s child’s EHC Plan and consulted with several schools. It issued a final EHC Plan naming a school. Mrs X appealed the contents of the EHC Plan, including the school named, to the SEND Tribunal. The Council issued a further final EHC Plan naming a different school. The Tribunal considered Mrs X’s appeal in January 2025 and ordered the Council to issue an EHC Plan naming another school.
  2. I cannot investigate Mrs X’s complaint that the Council named one school over another. This is because Mrs X has used her right of appeal to a tribunal about that decision. The Council’s decision-making process around the naming of the school, and the education provision in place during the appeal process are not matters that are separable from the appeal.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We will not investigate Mrs X’s complaint because she used her right of appeal to a tribunal and the issues raised are not separable from that appeal.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings