Suffolk County Council (24 017 663)

Category : Education > Special educational needs

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 31 Mar 2025

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about the Council failing to deliver provision in an Education, Health and Care Plan. The Council has offered a suitable remedy and an investigation by the Ombudsman would not lead to a different outcome.

The complaint

  1. The complainant, whom I shall refer to as Mrs X, complained her son (Y) failed to receive the Occupational Therapy (OT) contained in his Education, Health and Care Plan (EHC Plan). Mrs X says the Council failed to respond to an offer from an OT provider and gave her misleading information about why it had not delivered the OT provision.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. We investigate complaints about ‘maladministration’ and ‘service failure’, which we call ‘fault’. We must also consider whether any fault has had an adverse impact on the person making the complaint, which we call ‘injustice’. We provide a free service, but must use public money carefully. We do not start or continue an investigation if we decide:
  • we could not add to any previous investigation by the organisation, or
  • further investigation would not lead to a different outcome.
  • there is no worthwhile outcome achievable by our investigation.

(Local Government Act 1974, section 24A(6), as amended, section 34(B))

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information provided by the complainant and the Council.
  2. I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. In response to Mrs X’s complaint the Council accepted Y did not receive the OT in his EHC Plan between September and December 2023. The Council offered a total remedy of £1400.
  2. While I understand Mrs X’s frustrations, we will not start an investigation into her complaint. Regardless of why Mrs X’s son did not receive his OT provision, I have not seen any evidence the remedy offered by the Council is inappropriate. It is in line with our Guidance on Remedies which we use to calculate payments in cases like this. Also, we have considered a previous complaint from Mrs X which included a similar issue. We made various recommendations, and it is unlikely an investigation would lead to us suggesting further service improvements.
  3. An investigation by the Ombudsman would therefore be unlikely to lead to a higher payment or lead to a different outcome.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We will not investigate Mrs X’s complaint because it would be unlikely to lead to a different outcome.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings