City of Bradford Metropolitan District Council (24 014 972)

Category : Education > Special educational needs

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 11 Dec 2024

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We cannot investigate Ms X’s complaint about her child’s education and the content of their Education, Health and Care Plan. This is because Ms X has used her right of appeal and so the complaint is outside our jurisdiction.

The complaint

  1. Ms X complained about her child’s Education, Health and Care Plan (EHC Plan). Ms X says the Council named an unsuitable school meaning her child was out of education. Ms X is unhappy with the conduct of council officers during her appeal to a Tribunal. Ms X wants her child’s caseworker changed.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. The Local Government Act 1974 sets out our powers but also imposes restrictions on what we can investigate.
  2. We cannot investigate a complaint if someone has appealed to a tribunal about the same matter. We also cannot investigate a complaint if in doing so we would overlap with the role of a tribunal to decide something which has been or could have been referred to it to resolve using its own powers. (Local Government Act 1974, section 26(6)(a), as amended)

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information provided by Ms X and the Council.
  2. I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. We will not start an investigation into Ms X’s complaint. Parents unhappy with their child’s EHC Plan have a right of appeal to the SEND Tribunal. Where appeal rights have been used, the matter is outside our jurisdiction from the point at which the appeal rights were available. As well as the school named in the EHC Plan, we cannot consider the conduct of the Council’s officers during the appeal process. The education Ms X’s child received during the appeal period is also not something we can consider. The Council considered the school named in the EHC Plan to be suitable. Ms X disagreed. The education received is therefore directly linked to the matter appealed and so is also outside our jurisdiction.
  2. Ms X says that since the SEND Tribunal issued its decision there are still issues with communication and her caseworkers. These need to be put to the Council but it is not our role to say if Ms X’s caseworker should be changed.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We cannot investigate Ms X’s complaint because it is outside our jurisdiction.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings