Medway Council (24 013 371)

Category : Education > Special educational needs

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 07 Nov 2024

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We cannot investigate Mr X’s complaint about the Council’s failure to secure a suitable educational setting for his child, and the suitability of remedy it provided. This is because it was reasonable for Mr X to appeal to the Tribunal.

The complaint

  1. Mr X complains the Council:
    • failed to secure a suitable school for his son, Y in a timely manner. Y has been out of education since October 2023;
    • provided a financial payment to remedy the missed provision which he feels is insufficient, and;
    • failed to appropriately communicate with him.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. The Local Government Act 1974 sets out our powers but also imposes restrictions on what we can investigate.
  2. The law says we cannot normally investigate a complaint when someone has a right of appeal, reference or review to a tribunal about the same matter. However, we may decide to investigate if we consider it would be unreasonable to expect the person to use this right. (Local Government Act 1974, section 26(6)(a), as amended)
  3. The First-tier Tribunal (Special Educational Needs and Disability) considers appeals against council decisions regarding special educational needs. We refer to it as the SEND Tribunal in this decision statement.

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information provided by the complainant and the Council.
  2. I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. The Council issued Y’s final Educational, Health and Care (EHC) Plan in September 2023. No school was named in the final EHC Plan as the Council had not identified a suitable setting.
  2. The lack of named placement in the Y’s final EHC Plan carried a right of appeal to the SEND Tribunal, and it was reasonable for Mr X to use this. Any injustice due to a lack of educational provision is not separable from this point of appeal. Therefore, I cannot investigate Mr X’s complaint.
  3. I appreciate Mr X is unhappy with the Council’s handling of the matter and its communication, however it is not good use of public resources to investigate this part of his complaint in isolation when I cannot investigate the substantive matter.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We cannot investigate Mr X’s complaint because it was reasonable for him to use his right of appeal.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings