Derby City Council (24 011 073)

Category : Education > Special educational needs

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 09 Dec 2024

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about how the Council has reviewed Miss X’s son’s special educational needs. This is because Miss X has used her right of appeal to a tribunal and the issues she raises are not separable from that appeal.

The complaint

  1. Miss X complains about how the Council has dealt with her son, Y’s, Education Health and Care (EHC) plan. Miss X says the Council issued a final plan without holding a phase transfer review meeting, failed to obtain suitable professional advice and finalised the EHC Plan without issuing a draft.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. The Local Government Act 1974 sets out our powers but also imposes restrictions on what we can investigate.
  2. We cannot investigate a complaint if someone has appealed to a tribunal about the same matter. We also cannot investigate a complaint if in doing so we would overlap with the role of a tribunal to decide something which has been or could have been referred to it to resolve using its own powers. (Local Government Act 1974, section 26(6)(a), as amended)
  3. The First-tier Tribunal (Special Educational Needs and Disability) considers appeals against council decisions regarding special educational needs. We refer to it as the SEND Tribunal in this decision statement.

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information provided by the complainant.
  2. I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. I cannot investigate Miss X’s complaint because she has used her right of appeal against the contents of Y’s EHC Plan to the SEND Tribunal. Any lack of appropriate education or SEN provision included in the plan as a result of the issues she raises is not separable from the substantive matter being appealed.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We will not investigate Miss X’s complaint because the issues raised are not separable from her appeal to the SEND Tribunal.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings