Birmingham City Council (24 009 988)

Category : Education > Special educational needs

Decision : Not upheld

Decision date : 27 Apr 2025

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We have discontinued our investigation into Miss X’s complaint about the Council’s failure to secure alternative provision for her son when he was excluded from school. The Council acknowledged its failure and offered Miss X a remedy in line with our guidance on remedies which Miss X accepted. Further investigation would not lead to a different outcome.

The complaint

  1. Miss X complained the Council did not secure alternative provision for her son, Y when he was permanently excluded from school. She also complained about other issues related to Y being out of school.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. It is our decision whether to start, and when to end an investigation into something the law allows us to investigate. (Local Government Act 1974, sections 24A(6) and 34B(8), as amended)
  2. We investigate complaints about ‘maladministration’ and ‘service failure’, which we call ‘fault’. We must also consider whether any fault has had an adverse impact on the person making the complaint, which we call ‘injustice’. We provide a free service, but must use public money carefully. We do not start or continue an investigation if we decide:
  • we could not add to any previous investigation by the organisation, or
  • further investigation would not lead to a different outcome.

(Local Government Act 1974, section 24A(6), as amended, section 34(B))

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered evidence provided by Miss X and the Council as well as relevant law, policy and guidance.
  2. Miss X and the Council had an opportunity to comment on my draft decision. I considered any comments received before making a final decision.

Back to top

What I found

  1. In September 2023, Miss X’s son, Y was permanently excluded from school. Seven weeks later, the Council secured home tuition for Y only engaged with this for a week.
  2. From January to March 2024, the Council secured alternative home tuition for Y. When this ended, Miss X complained to the Council.
  3. In the Council’s final response in August 2024, it acknowledged that it had failed to secure a complete package of alternative provision for Y. It offered a financial remedy of £2747 in recognition of 29 weeks of missed education as well as £100 to Miss X for the time and trouble it had taken her to complain.
  4. Miss X accepted the remedy payment offered by the Council.
  5. The remedy offered by the Council was in line with our guidance on remedies. Further investigation is unlikely to result in a different outcome. I have discontinued my investigation.

Back to top

Decision

  1. I have discontinued my investigation. Further investigation would be unlikely to result in a different outcome.

Investigator’s decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings