Summary: We will not investigate Miss X’s complaint about delays in the Education Health and Care Plan process. This is because the Council has agreed to apologise to Miss X and pay her £100 per month for the delay. We consider this an appropriate remedy and further investigation is therefore unlikely to achieve anything more.

The complaint

1. The complainant, Miss X, complains the Council failed to complete the Education, Health and Care (EHC) needs assessment process for her son, Y, in accordance with the statutory deadlines. Miss X requested an assessment in August 2023 but the Council initially refused to carry one out. It reversed its decision following mediation and agreed to carry out an assessment on 10 October 2023. But the Council has not yet completed the process or decided whether to issue Y an EHC Plan.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

2. We investigate complaints of injustice caused by ‘maladministration’  and ‘service failure’. I have used the word fault to refer to these. Service failure can happen when an organisation fails to provide a service as it should have done because of circumstances outside its control. We do not need to show any blame, intent, flawed policy or process, or bad faith by an organisation to say service failure (fault) has occurred. (Local Government Act 1974, sections 26(1), as amended)
3. We provide a free service, but must use public money carefully. We may decide not to start or continue with an investigation if we are satisfied with the actions an organisation has taken or proposes to take. (Local Government Act 1974, section 24A(7), as amended)

How I considered this complaint

4. I considered information provided by Miss X and the Council.
5. I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.
6. Under our information sharing agreement, we will share this decision with the Office for Standards in Education, Children’s Services and Skills (Ofsted).

Back to top

My assessment

7. Councils are required to make a decision about whether to carry out an assessment within six weeks of the initial request. They must then give notice of their decision about whether to issue an EHC Plan within 16 weeks and, if they decide to issue an EHC Plan they must do so within 20 weeks.
8. The Council’s decision to concede Mrs X’s appeal and assess Y for an EHC Plan re-starts the needs assessment process at Week 6. It should therefore have told Mrs X if it intended to issue Y an EHC Plan by 19 December 2023 and, if it decided to issue a Plan, it should have finalised this by 16 January 2024.
9. To date the Council has not reached a decision about whether to issue Y an EHC Plan and can provide no timescale for its decision on this point.
10. The Council has accepted delay in completing Y’s assessment and deciding whether to issue him an EHC Plan. It has explained that a lack of Educational Psychologists has contributed to the delay. The failure to issue a decision amounts to service failure.
11. We are satisfied the Council is taking action to deal with the issues caused by a lack of Educational Psychologists. In response to our findings in a previous case it sent us an action plan of its service improvements.
12. The Council has agreed to the following actions to remedy Miss X’s complaint:
• Apologise to Miss X for the delay in the EHC Plan process;
• Pay Miss X £100 for each month of delay. In the event the Council decides to issue Y an EHC plan this should be calculated from 16 January 2024 until the date the final Plan is issued. If it decides not to issue a plan, the amount should be calculated from 19 December 2023 until the Council notifies Miss X of its decision. The Council will make this payment within four weeks of sending Miss X the final EHC Plan, or notifying her of its decision not to issue a Plan.
13. I consider the remedy agreed by the Council is suitable and that it is taking steps to address the issue at the heart of this complaint. It is therefore unlikely investigation would achieve anything more for Miss X.

Back to top

Final decision

14. We will not investigate this complaint. This is because the Council has agreed a suitable remedy for the injustice caused by its delay.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman