West Sussex County Council (24 003 598)

Category : Education > Special educational needs

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 30 Jul 2024

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We cannot investigate most of Mrs X’s complaint because she has appealed the Council’s decision not to conduct an Education, Health and Care needs assessment of her child to the SEND Tribunal. We will not investigate the remainder of the complaint because an investigation is unlikely to achieve a different outcome.

The complaint

  1. Mrs X complained about delays in the Education, Health and Care (EHC) process regarding her child, Y. Mrs X also said the Council applied the wrong legal tests when it decided not to conduct an EHC needs assessment.
  2. Mrs X said these matters caused her frustration and uncertainty.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. The Local Government Act 1974 sets out our powers but also imposes restrictions on what we can investigate.
  2. We cannot investigate a complaint if someone has appealed to a tribunal about the same matter. We also cannot investigate a complaint if in doing so we would overlap with the role of a tribunal to decide something which has been or could have been referred to it to resolve using its own powers. (Local Government Act 1974, section 26(6)(a), as amended)
  3. We investigate complaints about ‘maladministration’ and ‘service failure’, which we call ‘fault’. We must also consider whether any fault has had an adverse impact on the person making the complaint, which we call ‘injustice’. We provide a free service, but must use public money carefully. We do not start or continue an investigation if we decide:
  • further investigation would not lead to a different outcome, or
  • there is no worthwhile outcome achievable by our investigation.

(Local Government Act 1974, section 24A(6), as amended, section 34(B))

  1. The First-tier Tribunal (Special Educational Needs and Disability) considers appeals against council decisions regarding special educational needs. We refer to it as the SEND Tribunal in this decision statement.

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information provided by the complainant.
  2. I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. We cannot investigate Mrs X’s complaint about the Council’s decision to refuse to conduct an EHC needs assessment of her child or the basis upon which the Council made its decision. This is because Mrs X has appealed the decision to the SEND Tribunal and the law says we cannot investigate.
  2. We will not investigate Mrs X’s complaint about delay in the EHC process. The Council sent the decision notice two weeks late. In its complaint response, it apologised for the delay. An investigation by the Ombudsman is unlikely to achieve any additional outcome, and therefore we will not investigate this complaint.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We cannot investigate most of Mrs X’s complaint because she has appealed the Council’s decision to a tribunal. We will not investigate the remainder of the complaint because an investigation is unlikely to achieve a different outcome.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings