City of Bradford Metropolitan District Council (23 019 639)

Category : Education > Special educational needs

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 21 Apr 2024

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about the school where Miss X’s child has been placed. She has a right to appeal to a Tribunal for a different school placement it would be reasonable to use.

The complaint

  1. Miss X said the Council placed her child in a school that does not meet his special educational needs. She said another council, where the school is situated, refused to send her a copy of her child’s Education Health and Care (EHC) Plan.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. The Local Government Act 1974 sets out our powers but also imposes restrictions on what we can investigate.
  2. The law says we cannot normally investigate a complaint when someone has a right of appeal, reference or review to a tribunal about the same matter. However, we may decide to investigate if we consider it would be unreasonable to expect the person to use this right. (Local Government Act 1974, section 26(6)(a), as amended)
  3. The First-tier Tribunal (Special Educational Needs and Disability) considers appeals against council decisions regarding special educational needs. We refer to it as the SEND Tribunal in this decision statement.

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information provided by the complainant.
  2. I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.
  3. Bradford MBC is responsible for the content of the child’s EHC Plan and choosing the school. Therefore, the other council is not the proper subject of the complaint, and we cannot investigate it telling Miss X she should contact Bradford MBC to ask for a copy of her child’s EHC Plan.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. The complaint concerns the suitability of a school named by Bradford MBC (the Council) in an EHC Plan. Only the SEND Tribunal can decide what school should be named in an EHC Plan. We cannot do that. Thus, Miss X has or had a right of appeal to the SEND Tribunal it would be reasonable to use if she disputes the school named by the Council.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We will not investigate Miss X’s complaint because she has or had a right of appeal to the SEND Tribunal it would be reasonable to use.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings