Surrey County Council (23 018 505)

Category : Education > Special educational needs

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 23 Nov 2024

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about the Education, Health and Care Plan process for the complainant’s child. This is because it was reasonable for Mrs X to use her right of appeal.

The complaint

  1. The complainant, whom I shall refer to as Mrs X, complained about the Education, Health and Care Plan (EHC Plan) process for her child. Mrs X is unhappy with the content of her child’s EHC Plan and how the Council decided it.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. The Local Government Act 1974 sets out our powers but also imposes restrictions on what we can investigate.
  2. The law says we cannot normally investigate a complaint when someone has a right of appeal, reference or review to a tribunal about the same matter. However, we may decide to investigate if we consider it would be unreasonable to expect the person to use this right. (Local Government Act 1974, section 26(6)(a), as amended)
  3. The First-tier Tribunal (Special Educational Needs and Disability) considers appeals against council decisions regarding special educational needs. We refer to it as the SEND Tribunal in this decision statement.

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information provided by the complainant and the Council.
  2. I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. We will not investigate Mrs X’s complaint.
  2. Parents unhappy with the content of their child’s EHC Plan have a right of appeal to the SEND Tribunal. It is the mechanism established by Parliament for parents to challenge such decisions. The Tribunal can decide if the content of an EHC Plan should be changed and if the Council should carry out any further assessments. These are not decisions we can take. An appeal to the Tribunal could, however, give Mrs X the outcome she wants. We cannot. It was therefore reasonable for Mrs X to appeal and so we will not investigate.
  3. The way the Council reached its decisions about the content of the EHC Plan link directly the matter Mrs X could have appealed and so is outside our jurisdiction.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We will not investigate Mrs X’s complaint because it was reasonable for her to use her right of appeal to the SEND Tribunal.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings