Kent County Council (23 002 287)

Category : Education > Special educational needs

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 06 Jun 2023

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about the Council sharing information with external organisations without Ms X’s consent. Complaints about data protection are better dealt with by the Information Commissioner’s Office.

The complaint

  1. Ms X complains the Council has breached data protection regulations by sharing unredacted copies of her son’s Education, Health and Care plan with multiple colleges in its area without her knowledge or consent. She says this has led to these organisations receiving a disproportionate and unreasonably large amount of their personal information. She also says the Council has failed to respond to her complaint. She wants the Council to respond to her complaint and review its data handling procedures.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. The Ombudsman investigates complaints about ‘maladministration’ and ‘service failure’, which we call ‘fault’. We must also consider whether any fault has had an adverse impact on the person making the complaint, which we call ‘injustice’. We provide a free service, but must use public money carefully. We do not start or may decide not to continue with an investigation if we decide there is another body better placed to consider this complaint.

(Local Government Act 1974, section 24A(6))

  1. We normally expect someone to refer the matter to the Information Commissioner if they have a complaint about data protection. However, we may decide to investigate if we think there are good reasons. (Local Government Act 1974, section 24A(6), as amended)

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information provided by the complainant.
  2. I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. We will not investigate this complaint about the Council sharing information without Ms X’s consent. The complaint relates to data protection and the Information Commissioner’s Office (ICO) is better placed to consider these matters.
  2. She also complains about Council delay responding to her complaint. She has already sought advice from the ICO about the delay, who have contacted the Council on her behalf. It would be appropriate for her to seek further advice from the ICO if there is ongoing delay. The ICO could consider whether to use its discretion to accept her complaint early, if the Council continues to fail to provide a response.
  3. In addition, it is not a good use of public resources to us to investigate complaints about complaint procedures, if we are unable to deal with the substantive issue.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We will not investigate Ms X’s complaint because the ICO are better placed to deal with the matters complained about.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings