Kingston Upon Hull City Council (21 013 801)

Category : Education > Special educational needs

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 02 Feb 2022

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about how the Council have assessed a child’s special educational needs, which the complainant says will result in an inadequate Education Health and Care plan. This is because the contend of the plan carry the right of appeal to a tribunal.

The complaint

  1. The complainant, who I will call Mrs X, complains about how the Council have assessed her daughter’s Special Educational Needs (SEN). Mrs X says the Councils failure to seek the correct advice will lead to an insufficient Education Health and Care (EHC) plan which will not meet her daughters needs.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. The Local Government Act 1974 sets out our powers but also imposes restrictions on what we can investigate.
  2. The law says we cannot normally investigate a complaint when someone can appeal to a tribunal. However, we may decide to investigate if we consider it would be unreasonable to expect the person to appeal. (Local Government Act 1974, section 26(6)(a), as amended)
  3. The First-tier Tribunal (Special Educational Needs and Disability) considers appeals against council decisions regarding special educational needs. We refer to it as the SEND Tribunal in this decision statement.

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information provided by the complainant and the Council.
  2. I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. I will not investigate this complaint. This is because the EHC plan is currently at draft stage and changes are currently being considered. Once a final plan is issued Mrs X will have the right to appeal the contents of the plan to the SEND tribunal, this is the appropriate way to challenge the contents of an EHC plan.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We will not investigate Mrs X’s complaint because she has the right to challenge the contents of the EHC plan to a tribunal.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings