Devon County Council (20 008 352)

Category : Education > Special educational needs

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 14 Jan 2021

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We cannot investigate Miss B’s complaint that the Council has failed to make appropriate educational provision for her son. This is because Miss B has used her right to appeal against the content of her son’s Education Health and Care Plan, and this places the matter outside our jurisdiction.

The complaint

  1. The complainant, who I will refer to as Miss B, complains that the Council has failed to make appropriate educational provision for her son.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. The Local Government Act 1974 sets out our powers but also imposes restrictions on what we can investigate.
  2. We cannot investigate a complaint if someone has appealed to a tribunal. (Local Government Act 1974, section 26(6)(a), as amended)
  3. SEND is a tribunal that considers special educational needs. (The Special Educational Needs and Disability Tribunal (‘SEND’))

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I have considered what Miss B has said in support of her complaint and relevant correspondence provided by the Council.

Back to top

What I found

  1. Miss B’s son has special educational needs and an Education Health and Care Plan (EHCP). Miss B says he cannot attend the school named in his EHCP and that the school says it cannot meet his needs.
  2. The annual review of the EHCP was carried out in June 2020 and was followed by a reassessment. The Council says the amended EHCP was issued in October 2020. Miss B’s son’s current school was named. Miss B appealed to SEND against the named school.
  3. Miss B says the Council agreed to put a bespoke package of education in place to meet her son’s needs and complains that it has failed to do so. She complains that, as a result, her son is not receiving any form of education.
  4. The Ombudsman cannot investigate Miss B’s complaint. This is because the alleged failure she identified coincides with her appeal to SEND. The courts have held that, when an appeal to SEND is made, the Ombudsman has no jurisdiction to consider related issues from the date appeal rights became available to the point at which SEND issues its decision.
  5. This restriction applies to Miss B’s complaint about the Council’s failure to make provision for her son. This is the case even though the appeal cannot provide a remedy for the loss of provision. We cannot investigate Miss B’s complaint. There is no discretion available to us in this matter.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We cannot investigate this complaint. This is because Miss B has used her right to complain to SEND.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings