Kirklees Metropolitan Borough Council (25 019 775)

Category : Education > School transport

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 20 Apr 2026

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about the Council’s decision to refuse Mr Y’s blue badge application because we are unlikely to find fault in the Council’s actions.

The complaint

  1. Mr Y complains that the Council refused his application for a blue badge for his child (Z). He says the Council did not apply the correct criteria when assessing Z’s needs and refusing his blue badge.
  2. Mr Y wants the Council to review the application.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

We investigate complaints about ‘maladministration’ and ‘service failure’, which we call ‘fault’. We must also consider whether any fault has had an adverse impact on the person making the complaint, which we call ‘injustice’. We provide a free service, but must use public money carefully. We do not start or continue an investigation if we decide there is not enough evidence of fault to justify investigating. (Local Government Act 1974, section 24A(6), as amended, section 34(B)).

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information provided by Mr Y and the Council.
  2. I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. Mr Y applied for a blue badge for his child (Z). The Council refused his application and Mr Y appealed this decision. The Council refused the appeal.
  2. The Council considered evidence Mr Y provided. It explained why it did not consider Mr Y’s child as meeting the criteria to qualify for a blue badge.
  3. I understand Mr Y disagrees with the decision to refuse his application for a blue badge. However, as the Council properly considered the application, we are unlikely to find fault in its actions to warrant an investigation by the Ombudsman.
  4. The Ombudsman is not an appeal body. This means we do not take a second look at a decision to decide if it was wrong. Instead, we look at the processes an organisation followed to make its decision. If we consider it followed those processes correctly, we cannot question whether the decision was right or wrong, regardless of whether someone disagree with the decision the organisation made.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings