Warwickshire County Council (25 014 227)

Category : Education > School transport

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 09 Feb 2026

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We will not investigate Ms M complaint about school transport because there is not enough evidence of fault to justify investigation by us.

The complaint

  1. Ms M complains the Council refused her application for home to school transport for her daughter. She disagrees with the decision and thinks the appeal was unfair.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. We investigate complaints about ‘maladministration’ and ‘service failure’, which we call ‘fault’. We must also consider whether any fault has had an adverse impact on the person making the complaint, which we call ‘injustice’. We provide a free service, but must use public money carefully. We do not start or continue an investigation if we decide:
  • there is not enough evidence of fault to justify investigating, or
  • further investigation would not lead to a different outcome.

(Local Government Act 1974, section 24A(6), as amended, section 34(B))

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information provided by Ms M.
  2. I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. Ms M explained why she wants the Council to provide school transport for her daughter. I have not included the details here to ensure their anonymity.
  2. Ms M’s application was unsuccessful. Ms M appealed the Council’s decision at both stages of the Council’s appeals process. Her appeals were unsuccessful too. Unhappy with the outcome, Ms M complained to us.
  3. We do not decide whether the Council should provide home to school transport for Ms M's daughter. This is the Council’s job. We are not another appeal. Our role is to check the Council made its decision properly. This means we check the Council followed relevant legislation, guidance and policies, and took account of all relevant information. We cannot question Council decisions taken without fault, no matter how strongly Ms M disagrees.
  4. The final decision letter from the Council shows the appeal panel took account of all the reasons Ms M gave for requesting school transport for her daughter.
  5. There is not enough evidence of fault in the information Ms M provided to justify further investigation by us. Further investigation would not lead to a different outcome.

Final decision

  1. We will not investigate Ms M’s complaint because there is not enough evidence of fault to justify investigation by us.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings