North Northamptonshire Council (25 013 962)

Category : Education > School transport

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 12 Feb 2026

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We will not investigate Ms M’s complaint about school transport because the Council has offered to arrange an appeal hearing. It would be reasonable for Ms M to use this right of appeal. There is nothing worthwhile we could achieve by investigating her complaint now.

The complaint

  1. Ms M complains the Council refused her application for home to school transport for her son.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. We investigate complaints about ‘maladministration’ and ‘service failure’, which we call ‘fault’. We must also consider whether any fault has had an adverse impact on the person making the complaint, which we call ‘injustice’. We provide a free service, but must use public money carefully. We do not start or continue an investigation if we decide:
  • it would be reasonable for the person to use a council review or appeal; and
  • there is no worthwhile outcome achievable by our investigation.

(Local Government Act 1974, section 24A(6), as amended, section 34(B))

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information provided by Ms M and the Council.
  2. I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. The Council provided school transport for Ms M’s son until July 2025. He joined the sixth form at the same school in September 2025. The Council refused Ms M’s application for home to school transport. Her appeal at the first stage of the Council’s appeals process was unsuccessful.
  2. Unhappy with the outcome, Ms M complained to us. She also asked the Council to consider her appeal at the second stage of the appeals process.
  3. We are currently receiving a large number of complaints. We are not able to respond as quickly as we would like. We began to consider Ms M’s complaint in February 2026.
  4. I asked the Council for information.
  5. The Council said the stage two appeal Ms M requested was never arranged. It appears there may have been an oversight. The Council said it would arrange the appeal now.
  6. We will not investigate Ms M’s complaint because it would be reasonable for her to use the appeal the Council has offered.
  7. We do not decide whether the Council should provide transport for Ms M’s son. Only the Council can decide. Our job is to check the Council makes its decision properly. The Council has not made its final decision until it has heard Ms M’s stage two appeal. There is no worthwhile outcome achievable by investigating Ms M’s complaint now.
  8. If Ms M remains unhappy following the appeal, she can complain to us again.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We will not investigate Ms M’s complaint because the Council has offered to arrange an appeal hearing. It would be reasonable for Ms M to use this right of appeal. There is nothing worthwhile we could achieve by investigating her complaint now.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings