Wakefield City Council (25 013 396)

Category : Education > School transport

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 03 Feb 2026

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We will not investigate Ms M’s complaint about post-16 transport for her son because it would be reasonable for her to use the Council’s appeals process. There is nothing worthwhile we could achieve by investigating Ms M’s complaint at this stage.

The complaint

  1. Ms M complains the Council refused her request for transport assistance for her son. She says she often needs to make several return journeys each day to support him at college.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. We investigate complaints about ‘maladministration’ and ‘service failure’, which we call ‘fault’. We must also consider whether any fault has had an adverse impact on the person making the complaint, which we call ‘injustice’. We provide a free service, but must use public money carefully. We do not start or continue an investigation if we decide:
  • it would be reasonable for the person to ask for a council review or appeal; or
  • there is no worthwhile outcome achievable by our investigation.

(Local Government Act 1974, section 24A(6), as amended, section 34(B))

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information provided by Ms M and the Council.
  2. I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. Ms M applied for transport assistance for her son. He attends a local college.
  2. The Council refused Ms M’s application. The Council’s decision letter said Ms M could appeal the decision and provided a link to the Council’s appeals process.
  3. The letter also said Ms M may be able to complain to us if she was unhappy with the process by which the Council had made its decision.
  4. Ms M complained to us. She explained why she wanted the Council to provide transport assistance.
  5. We do not decide whether the Council should provide transport assistance for Ms M’s son. This is the Council’s job. Ms M needs to use the Council’s appeals process. I consider it would be reasonable for her to do so. There nothing I could achieve by investigating Ms M’s complaint at this stage.
  6. Ms M may complain to us again once she has completed the Council’s appeals process if she is unhappy with the outcome. The appeals process usually has two stages, and we would expect someone to use them both.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We will not investigate Ms M’s complaint because it would be reasonable for her to use the Council’s education transport appeals process. There is nothing worthwhile we could achieve by investigating Ms M’s complaint at this stage.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings