Manchester City Council (24 009 292)

Category : Education > School transport

Decision : Upheld

Decision date : 31 Oct 2024

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We will not investigate Ms X’s complaint about the Council’s decision not to provide free school transport. This is because the Council has agreed to resolve the complaint early by providing a proportionate remedy for the injustice caused.

The complaint

  1. Ms X complains the Council failed to appropriately consider her child Y’s Special Educational Needs (SEN) and her family’s circumstance in its decision to refuse free school transport. She says its decision has caused avoidable stress and added further challenges to their lives.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. We investigate complaints about ‘maladministration’ and ‘service failure’. In this statement, I have used the word fault to refer to these. We must also consider whether any fault has had an adverse impact on the person making the complaint. I refer to this as ‘injustice’. If there has been fault which has caused significant injustice, or that could cause injustice to others in the future we may suggest a remedy. (Local Government Act 1974, sections 26(1) and 26A(1), as amended)
  2. We consider whether there was fault in the way an organisation made its decision. If there was no fault in how the organisation made its decision, we cannot question the outcome. (Local Government Act 1974, section 34(3), as amended)

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information provided by the complainant and the Council.
  2. I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. Ms X appealed the refusal. The Council rejected the appeal basing its decision on Ms X’s ability to cope with the challenges Y’s SEN presents while relying on support from relatives.
  2. If we investigated this complaint, it is likely we would find fault by the Council in the way it considered the appeal against its statutory duties. This is because I do not consider that the Council fully assessed eligibility on the grounds of Y’s SEN.
  3. I therefore asked the Council to consider resolving this complaint by reconsidering Ms X’s application within a month to remedy the distress caused by its refusal.
  4. To its credit, the Council accepted my recommendation and has reconsidered its decision by agreeing to arrange free school transport for Y with immediate effect.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We have upheld this complaint because the Council agreed to resolve it by providing a proportionate remedy for the injustice caused by the likely fault.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings