Birmingham City Council (24 007 502)

Category : Education > School transport

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 26 Nov 2024

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about the Council’s decision to offer Mr X a personal transport budget rather than a taxi to travel to college. The Council acted properly by considering the evidence presented and could decide the budget and independent travel training were sufficient to meet his need. There is not enough of evidence of fault by the Council to warrant our further involvement.

The complaint

  1. Miss X complained on behalf of her adult son, Mr X, that the Council wrongly decided his transport need to college did not require the provision of a taxi.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. We investigate complaints of injustice caused by ‘maladministration’ and ‘service failure’. I have used the word fault to refer to these. We consider whether there was fault in the way an organisation made its decision. If there was no fault in how the organisation made its decision, we cannot question the outcome. (Local Government Act 1974, section 34(3), as amended)

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information provided by the complainant and the Council.
  2. I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. The records of the transport appeals process show the Council decided that Mr X did not need taxi transport to college. It instead decided that he could travel with the aid of a personal transport budget if training was provided.
  2. The records show that the Council took account of Mr X’s EHC Plan, quoting it and taking the view it did not mean Mr X needed taxi transport. The Council was entitled to reach that view as it considered the evidence put forward. I am not entitled to substitute another view unless there was fault in the process. There was not. That Miss X disagrees with the Council’s opinion is not evidence of fault in its process.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We will not investigate Miss X’s complaint because there is not enough evidence of fault by the Council to warrant our further involvement.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings