Kent County Council (23 020 661)

Category : Education > School transport

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 01 May 2024

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about the standard of a Council bus service. Though the Council does acknowledge failings, there is insufficient evidence of a significant enough injustice being caused to the complainant to warrant a formal investigation.

The complaint

  1. The complainant (Ms Y) complains on behalf of her young daughter (Child X) about the cleanliness of her bus to school. Ms Y also says the bus experiences occasional breakdowns and unexpected changes to the normal route. She explains the alleged fault causes Child X upset and is a safety concern. As a desired outcome, Ms Y wants the Council to improve the bus service.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. We investigate complaints about ‘maladministration’ and ‘service failure’, which we call ‘fault’. We must also consider whether any fault has had an adverse impact on the complainant, which we call ‘injustice’. We provide a free service, but must use public money carefully. We do not start an investigation if we decide any injustice is not significant enough to justify our involvement. (Local Government Act 1974, section 24A(6), as amended, section 34(B)).

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information provided by the complainant and the Council. I also considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. The Council acknowledges the standard of the bus service has not been to the required level and it has referenced issues with staff shortages, unplanned roadworks and an increase in mechanical failures. There is therefore a likelihood of finding of fault were we to investigate. That said, though I recognise the issues the complainant raises, the alleged fault is limited to causing Ms Y and Child X occasional inconvenience. The claimed injustice Ms Y refers to about safety concerns is speculative as opposed to showing evidence of actual harm. I see no evidence of either her or Child X suffering serious loss, harm or distress by reason of cleanliness concerns, isolated breakdowns or rerouting. In my view, there is insufficient evidence of a significant enough injustice being caused to warrant an investigation.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We will not investigate this complainant. There is insufficient evidence of a significant enough injustice being caused to warrant a formal investigation.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings