Warrington Council (19 011 361)

Category : Education > School transport

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 13 Feb 2020

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: The Ombudsman will not investigate Mr X’s complaint about the Council’s decision not to provide his son with free transport to college. The Council has allowed parents of non-eligible post 16 special educational needs students to purchase empty seats available on existing transport. Mr X has purchased a seat on a vehicle and is satisfied with this.

The complaint

  1. Mr X complains about the Council’s decsion to refuse post 16 school transport for his son who has Special Educational Needs. Mr X says that the Council failed to properly consider his son’s needs and therefore the decision is wrong.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. We investigate complaints about ‘maladministration’ and ‘service failure’. In this statement, I have used the word ‘fault’ to refer to these. We must also consider whether any fault has had an adverse impact on the person making the complaint. I refer to this as ‘injustice’. We provide a free service but must use public money carefully. We may decide not to start or continue with an investigation if we believe:
  • it is unlikely further investigation will lead to a different outcome.

(Local Government Act 1974, section 24A(6), as amended)

  1. If we are satisfied with a council’s actions or proposed actions, we can complete our investigation and issue a decision statement. (Local Government Act 1974, section 30(1B) and 34H(i), as amended)

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I have considered Mr X’s complaint to the Ombudsman and the information the Council provided. I have also spoken with Mr X.
  2. I sent Mr X and the Council a copy of my draft decision and invited their comments. I considered the comments I received.

Back to top

What I found

  1. In response to the Ombudsman the Council said that following the appeal hearing, an exceptional arrangement has been agreed to allow parents of non-eligible post 16 special educational needs students to purchase empty seats available on existing transport. I spoke with Mr X who confirmed that he had purchased a seat for his son. Mr X is satisfied with this.
  2. The Ombudsman will not investigate Mr X’s complaint. An investigation would not achieve anything more for Mr X than the Council has already provided.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. For the reasons stated above, I have not investigated Mr X’s complaint.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings