Lincolnshire County Council (19 005 047)

Category : Education > School transport

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 19 Aug 2019

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: The Ombudsman cannot not investigate Mr A’s complaint that the Council was at fault in its response to his request for school transport for his son. This is because Mr A has appealed to a tribunal.

The complaint

  1. The complainant, who I will refer to as Mr A, complains that the Council was at fault in its response to his request for school transport for his son.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. The Local Government Act 1974 sets out our powers but also imposes restrictions on what we can investigate.
  2. We cannot investigate a complaint if someone has appealed to a tribunal. (Local Government Act 1974, section 26(6)(a), as amended)
  3. SEND is a tribunal that considers special educational needs. (The Special Educational Needs and Disability Tribunal (‘SEND’))

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I have considered what Mr A has said in support of his complaint and in response to my draft decision.

Back to top

What I found

  1. Mr A’s son has special educational needs and an Education Health and Care Plan (EHCP). He states that the Council provided school transport while his son was in primary education. However, it declined to provide school transport to his preferred secondary school, having named another school on the EHCP.
  2. Mr A appealed unsuccessfully to SEND. He complains that the Council led him to believe that the SEND hearing was informal, thereby placing him at a disadvantage. He asserts that evidence the Council submitted to SEND was false.
  3. Mr A took the matter to the Upper Tier Tribunal. He subsequently withdrew the appeal. He believes the Council acted unreasonably throughout the appeal process. He argues that the Council continues to be at fault in failing to provide transport for his son, causing his family significant distress and financial loss.
  4. The Ombudsman cannot investigate Mr A’s complaint. He has used his right to appeal to SEND. This places matters all relating to school transport provision for Mr A’s son’s outside the Ombudsman’s jurisdiction.
  5. The Ombudsman cannot consider whether the Council’s decision to refuse to provide school transport was reasonable because this was a matter for SEND. Neither can we consider the evidence the Council placed before SEND or the Upper Tier Tribunal. There is no discretion available to the Ombudsman on these matters.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. The Ombudsman cannot investigate this complaint. This is because Mr A has appealed to a tribunal.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings