London Borough of Lambeth (20 001 824)

Category : Education > School admissions

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 25 Sep 2020

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: The Ombudsman cannot investigate Ms X’s complaint that a school failed to provide her child with education. We should not investigate her complaint the Council delayed in allocating a school place as the delay is not the cause of any significant injustice.

The complaint

  1. The complainant, whom I shall call Ms X, says the Council delayed in providing her child, Z, with a school place, which meant that Z missed out on education from January 2020 until September 2020.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. We cannot investigate complaints about what happens in schools. (Local Government Act 1974, Schedule 5, paragraph 5(b), as amended)
  2. We investigate complaints about ‘maladministration’ and ‘service failure’. In this statement, I have used the word 'fault' to refer to these. We must also consider whether any fault has had an adverse impact on the person making the complaint. I refer to this as ‘injustice’. We provide a free service, but must use public money carefully. We may decide not to start or continue with an investigation if we believe:
    • the fault has not caused injustice to the person who complained, or
    • the injustice is not significant enough to justify the cost of our involvement (Local Government Act 1974, section 24A(6), as amended)

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered the information Ms X provided with her complaint and the Council’s responses to her which it provided. I considered Ms X’s comments on a draft version of this decision.

Back to top

What I found

  1. Ms X moved home in December 2019. She says in January 2020 she applied to this Council for a school place for her child, Z, in primary school. The Council informed her in late February 2020 that there was a place for Z at School Y.
  2. Ms X says School Y did not arrange for Z to attend School Y before it shut down in March 2020 due to the Covid rules. She says Z has missed out on schooling from January 2020 because of the Council’s delays and that it should have ensured School Y provided education to Z.
  3. The Council’s policy is to provide a school place to a child who is moving schools within 20 school days of application. If Ms X applied at the start of the school term in January 2020, then it is possible it took six weeks to offer a place. A two week delay is not significant enough injustice to justify an investigation.
  4. We have no power to investigate why School Y did not arrange the place to start before School Y shut. We also have no power to investigate School Y’s failure to provide Z with an education between March and July 2020.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. The Ombudsman will not and cannot investigate this complaint. This is because we cannot investigate the School’s failure to provide the school place or education and a two weeks delay in allocation the school place is not significant enough injustice to justify an investigation.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings