Bury Metropolitan Borough Council (19 007 772)

Category : Education > School admissions

Decision : Not upheld

Decision date : 08 Oct 2019

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: Mr F complained about the way in which an independent admission appeals panel considered his appeal for a place at Z School. Mr F has now moved house, submitted a new application for a place at Z School which was refused and so now has a fresh right of appeal. This investigation is discontinued as any finding of fault about the original appeal would be remedied by a fresh appeal and Mr F already has this. So further investigation cannot achieve a better outcome than Mr F already has and there is nothing to be gained by pursuing the complaint now.

The complaint

  1. The complainant, whom I shall I refer to as Mr F, complains the Council is at fault because the school admission appeal panel it arranged to consider his appeal for a place at Z school failed to properly consider his appeal. Specifically, it failed to:
  1. allow him the opportunity to hear and ask questions of the panel about the admission authority’s case;
  2. ensure the panel considered the appeal individually and incorrectly treated as part of a multiple appeal even though all the other appeals had been heard and decided previously; and
  3. wrongly considered his appeal for Z school and another school, Q School, in the same hearing.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. We can decide whether to start or discontinue an investigation into a complaint within our jurisdiction. (Local Government Act 1974, sections 24A(6) and 34B(8), as amended)
  2. We investigate complaints about ‘maladministration’ and ‘service failure’. In this statement, I have used the word ‘fault’ to refer to these. We must also consider whether any fault has had an adverse impact on the person making the complaint. I refer to this as ‘injustice’. We provide a free service, but must use public money carefully. We may decide not to start or continue with an investigation if we believe it is unlikely further investigation will lead to a different outcome, we cannot achieve the outcome someone wants, or it would be reasonable for the person to ask for a council review or appeal.(Local Government Act 1974, section 24A(6), as amended)
  3. If we are satisfied with a council’s actions or proposed actions, we can complete our investigation and issue a decision statement. (Local Government Act 1974, section 30(1B) and 34H(i), as amended)

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered the information Mr F provided with his complaint and also the information and papers the Council provided in response to our request for these.
  2. I also took account of information the Council provided after Mr F had submitted his complaint advising me that Mr F had moved house and submitted new applications for places at Z School and Q School from the new address.
  3. I have written to Mr F and the Council with my draft decision and given them an opportunity to comment.

Back to top

What I found

  1. Mr F applied to the Council for a year 7 secondary school place from September 2019 for his son at Z School when he moved to a new home in May 2019. The School was full and so the Council did not offer a place at Z School and advised Mr F of his right to appeal against this decision. Mr F submitted an appeal but this was unsuccessful.
  2. Mr F complained to this office about the conduct of that appeal. However, before completing our consideration of the appeal, the Council contacted us to say that Mr F had moved and applied again for a place at Z School from the new address. The Council says that the application was unsuccessful as the school was full and so it offered Mr F the right to appeal against this decision. As I understand it Mr F is proceeding with this appeal.
  3. As Mr F now has another appeal for a place at his preferred school from his new address I have exercised my discretion to discontinue my investigation of this complaint. This is because, even if I were to find fault with the conduct of the original appeal from his previous address, I would be most likely to recommend that the Council arrange a further appeal in order that the appeal could be heard properly. Mr F already has a fresh right of appeal from his new address so there is nothing to be gained by me pursuing the complaint further as I cannot achieve a different outcome from that he already has.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. I have discontinued my investigation of this complaint for the reasons given above.

Investigator’s decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings