What do complaints teach us about end of life care?

See our latest report on the lessons that can be learnt from our complaints about end of life care given in care homes and in the home.

Surrey County Council (25 022 275)

Category : Education > Other

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 17 Jun 2026

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We will not investigate Mr X’s complaint about the Council’s decision a nursery he ran was no longer eligible to receive funding to deliver the Government’s Free Early Education Entitlement (FEEE) because there is not enough evidence of fault to justify an investigation, and no worthwhile outcome achievable.

The complaint

  1. Mr X complains about the Council’s decision a nursery he ran was no longer eligible to receive funding to deliver the Government’s Free Early Education Entitlement (FEEE). The Council identified problems with paperwork and was not satisfied with Mr X’s efforts to resolve them. Mr X does not consider the Council gave him long enough to sort out the problems.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. We investigate complaints about ‘maladministration’ and ‘service failure’, which we call ‘fault’. We must also consider whether any fault has had an adverse impact on the person making the complaint, which we call ‘injustice’. We provide a free service, but must use public money carefully. We do not start or continue an investigation if we decide:
  • there is not enough evidence of fault to justify investigating, or
  • there is no worthwhile outcome achievable by our investigation.

(Local Government Act 1974, section 24A(6), as amended, section 34(B))

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information provided by the complainant.
  2. I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. Mr X accepts he made mistakes in the paperwork required by the Council. However, he says he did not intend to deceive the Council. He complains the Council did not allow him enough time to sort out the problems.
  2. The Council said it worked with Mr X for 12 months to try and resolve the problems. Mr X says it was only six months.
  3. There is not enough evidence of fault by the Council to justify an investigation by us. In any event, Mr X has now wound up his business. There is no worthwhile outcome achievable by our investigation.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We will not investigate Mr X’s complaint because there is not enough evidence of fault to justify an investigation, and no worthwhile outcome achievable.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings