Suffolk County Council (25 010 958)

Category : Education > Other

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 13 Jan 2026

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about the Council’s decision to restrict the complainants contact under its unreasonable behaviour policy. This is because the injustice caused is not significant enough to justify our involvement.

The complaint

  1. Mr X complains the Council has not followed its unreasonable behaviour policy correctly before restricting his contact.
  2. He says this has prevented him from being able to resolve his concerns about his children’s education.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. The Local Government Act 1974 sets out our powers but also imposes restrictions on what we can investigate.
  2. We investigate complaints about ‘maladministration’ and ‘service failure’, which we call ‘fault’. We must also consider whether any fault has had an adverse impact on the person making the complaint, which we call ‘injustice’. We provide a free service, but must use public money carefully. We do not start or continue an investigation if we decide:
  • there is not enough evidence of fault to justify investigating, or
  • any injustice is not significant enough to justify our involvement.

(Local Government Act 1974, section 24A(6), as amended, section 34(B))

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information provided by the complainant and the Council.
  2. I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. In 2025 the Council wrote to Mr X under its unreasonable behaviour policy and restricted his contact to one Council email address. Mr X complained this was not in line with the Council’s policy.
  2. We will not investigate this complaint as there is insufficient injustice to justify our involvement. While the Council limited Mr X’s contact, he could still contact the Council to discuss his children’s education using the email address he had been provided.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We will not investigate Mr X’s complaint because the injustice is not sufficient to justify our involvement.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings