London Borough of Redbridge (25 001 750)

Category : Education > Other

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 29 Jul 2025

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We will not investigate Mrs X’s complaint that the Council overpaid her for her services. The Council apologised, implemented service improvements, and reduced the amount it asked Mrs X to repay. An investigation by the Ombudsman is unlikely to achieve anything further.

The complaint

  1. Mrs X complained the Council failed to pay her correctly for services she provided. She said the Council overpaid her for a period of several months due to the Council’s administrative error and later requested the money back.
  2. Mrs X said the matter caused her distress and impacted her financially.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. We investigate complaints about ‘maladministration’ and ‘service failure’, which we call ‘fault’. We must also consider whether any fault has had an adverse impact on the person making the complaint, which we call ‘injustice’. We provide a free service, but must use public money carefully. We do not start or continue an investigation if we decide:
  • we could not add to any previous investigation by the organisation, or
  • further investigation would not lead to a different outcome.

(Local Government Act 1974, section 24A(6), as amended, section 34(B))

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information provided by the complainant.
  2. I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. We will not investigate Mrs X’s complaint that the Council overpaid her for her services.
  2. Mrs X said she assumed the payments she received were correct and had already spent the money when the Council realised its error. She said the error meant her finances were disrupted.
  3. In its complaint response, the Council:
      1. apologised for the error;
      2. explained service improvements it would implement to prevent recurrence of the fault; and
      3. reduced the amount it asked Mrs X to repay from ~£1,900 to £1,000.
  4. These are all actions the Ombudsman would expect the Council to take. The Council’s ~£900 reduction it already applied to the repayment request is more than the Ombudsman would likely have recommended considering the circumstances. The Council appropriately exercised its discretion and provided a suitable remedy.
  5. Consequently, an investigation is unlikely to achieve anything further, and so we will not investigate this complaint.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We will not investigate Mrs X’s complaint because an investigation is unlikely to achieve anything further.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings