Wakefield City Council (25 000 404)

Category : Education > Other

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 19 Jun 2025

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We cannot investigate Mr X’s complaint about the Council offering him only programmes for domestic abuse perpetrators rather than a course for male victims or survivors of domestic abuse as this matter could reasonably have been mentioned during court proceedings concerning the care of his child. A permanent legal bar prevents us investigating the complaint.

The complaint

  1. Mr X said the Council had failed to offer him an appropriate course for victims or survivors of domestic abuse, but instead offered him courses for perpetrators of domestic abuse. He said this has prevented less restrictive contact with his child.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. The Local Government Act 1974 sets out our powers but also imposes restrictions on what we can investigate.
  2. We have the power to start or end an investigation into a complaint about actions the law allows us to investigate. We may decide not to start or continue with an investigation if we think the issues could reasonably be, or have been mentioned as part of the legal proceedings regarding a closely related matter. (Local Government Act 1974, sections 24A(6) and 34B(8), as amended, section 34(B))

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information provided by the complainant and the Council.
  2. I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. The Council’s response to Mr X’s complaint, which was in the correspondence he sent us, stated that the court had considered the matter of domestic abuse in his relationship with his former partner.
  2. The complaint correspondence also contained a statement by him that indicated he raised the matter he now complains of at the time of court proceedings. It does not state if this was raised in court as opposed to being raised with a social worker at that time, but it would have been reasonable to do so as the court action concerned the care of his child.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We cannot investigate Mr X’s complaint because he could reasonably have mentioned the matter he complains of during court proceedings regarding the care of his child. A permanent legal bar prevents us investigating this complaint.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings