Stockport Metropolitan Borough Council (21 003 018)

Category : Education > Other

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 21 Jul 2021

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about the Council’s portage service. This is not warranted by the claimed injustice, and we could not add to the investigation already carried out by the Council.

The complaint

  1. Mr X said the Council excluded him as a non-primary parent from involvement with its portage service (a service for pre-school children with special educational needs and their parents) by not telling him of his son’s referral, failing to make a call as promised, not offering him a home visit and making excuses for what went wrong when he complained.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. The Ombudsman investigates complaints about ‘maladministration’ and ‘service failure’, which we call ‘fault’. We must also consider whether any fault has had an adverse impact on the person making the complaint, which we call ‘injustice’. We provide a free service, but must use public money carefully. We do not start or may decide not to continue with an investigation if we decide:
  • any injustice is not significant enough to justify our involvement, or
  • we could not add to any previous investigation by the organisation, or
  • further investigation would not lead to a different outcome.

(Local Government Act 1974, section 24A(6))

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information provided by the Mr X and the Council.
  2. I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. The Council accepted it had not involved Mr X when it referred his son to its portage service and afterwards. It accepted this was not correct when he complained. The matter was not prolonged, with the Council confirming it would act to prevent a repeat in other cases. Though Mr X remains dissatisfied, and the arrangements for a meeting offered by the Council are still disputed, further investigation is not warranted by the alleged injustice, and we could not add to the Council’s investigation or achieve more.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We will not investigate Mr X’s complaint because investigation is not warranted by the claimed injustice, and we could not add to the Council’s investigation or achieve more.

Investigator’s decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings