West Sussex County Council (20 008 912)

Category : Education > Other

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 23 Jul 2021

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about the conduct of a council legal officer in her role as Single Point of Contact (SPOC) for the complainant with his child’s school, and the way in which the Council has handled complaints about the matter. This is because the complaint does not meet the tests in our Assessment Code on how we decide which complaints to investigate. The substantive issue is out of our jurisdiction because it relates to someone carrying out a function on behalf of the governors and headteacher of a school. The Council’s actions in response to the complaints about the officer are also out of jurisdiction because they are in connection with something that is itself out of jurisdiction. Additionally allegations about breaches of GDPR should be made to the Information Commissioner’s Office.

The complaint

  1. The complainant, who I refer to here as Mr Q, complains about:
    • The conduct of a Council legal officer in her role as SPOC for him in relation to his contact with his child’s school;
    • Alleged breaches of GDPR; and
    • The way in which the Council has handled his complaints about these issues.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. The Local Government Act 1974 sets out our powers but also imposes restrictions on what we can investigate.
  2. We cannot investigate complaints about what happens in schools. (Local Government Act 1974, Schedule 5, paragraph 5(b), as amended)
  3. The Courts have said that we cannot investigate a complaint about any action by a council, concerning a matter which is itself out of our jurisdiction. (R (on the application of M) v Commissioner for Local Administration [2006] EHWCC 2847 (Admin))
  4. We normally expect someone to refer the matter to the Information Commissioner if they have a complaint about data protection. However, we may decide to investigate if we think there are good reasons. (Local Government Act 1974, section 24A(6), as amended)

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information provided by Mr Q.
  2. I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. I will not investigate this complaint because it is out of our jurisdiction. It concerns the actions of someone carrying out a role on behalf of the management of a school, and the Council’s actions regarding a matter which is itself out of our jurisdiction.

Investigator’s decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings