Kent County Council (19 019 464)
The Ombudsman's final decision:
Summary: The Ombudsman cannot investigate Ms T’s complaint that the Council failed to act against a pupil who was allegedly bullying her child. This is because we have no power to investigate the internal management of schools nor the Council’s response to a complaint about such matters.
The complaint
- Ms T complains her child’s school and the Council did not act against a pupil who was allegedly bullying her child.
The Ombudsman’s role and powers
- The Local Government Act 1974 sets out our powers but also imposes restrictions on what we can investigate.
- We cannot investigate complaints about what happens in schools. (Local Government Act 1974, Schedule 5, paragraph 5(b), as amended)
- The courts have decided we cannot investigate the consequences of a decision if investigation of the decision itself was excluded by Schedule 5 or s26(6) Local Government Act 1974. R (on the application of ER) v CLAE and London Borough of Hillingdon [2014] EWCA Civ 1407 and R(M) -v- CLAE [2006] EWHC 2847.
How I considered this complaint
- I have considered the information Ms T provided with her complaint and her comments on a draft of this decision.
What I found
- Ms T says her child was bullied at school. She says the Council offered her child a place at an alternative school. Ms T says neither the school nor the Council acted against the pupil alleged to be carrying out the bullying behaviour.
- Ms T says she complained to the school and the Council but is unhappy with the way her complaint was dealt with.
- The Ombudsman cannot investigate how a school manages its pupils’ behaviour and cannot investigate how a Council decides to deal with complaints about such behaviour.
Final decision
- The Ombudsman cannot investigate this complaint because we have no power to investigate the internal management of schools nor the Council’s response to a complaint about such matters.
Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman