London Borough of Haringey (17 018 433)

Category : Education > Other

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 22 Mar 2018

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: Ms X complains that a Council officer was rude to her in a telephone call. The Ombudsman will not investigate this complaint because there is insufficient injustice to warrant investigation.

The complaint

  1. Ms X complains that a Council officer was rude to her in a telephone call.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. We investigate complaints about ‘maladministration’ and ‘service failure’. In this statement, I have used the word ‘fault’ to refer to these. We must also consider whether any fault has had an adverse impact on the person making the complaint. I refer to this as ‘injustice’. We provide a free service, but must use public money carefully. We may decide not to start or continue with an investigation if we believe:
  • it is unlikely we would find fault, or
  • the fault has not caused injustice to the person who complained, or
  • the injustice is not significant enough to justify our involvement.

(Local Government Act 1974, section 24A(6), as amended)

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I have considered the complainant's comments and the Council's comments and Ms X has had an opportunity to comment on the draft decision.

Back to top

What I found

  1. Ms X says that she telephoned the Council in 2017 about an issue that had arisen over her free school meals. She says that the Council officer was rude to her but the officer also claimed that Ms X was rude. The Council says that a senior officer was present during the telephone call.
  2. I cannot say for certain what was said during the call, and I appreciate that Ms X was upset. However, I consider that the dissatisfaction with the content and tone of the conversation is not sufficient to warrant investigation by the Local Government Ombudsman.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. The Ombudsman will not investigate this complaint. This is because the injustice claimed is insufficient to warrant investigation.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

Privacy settings

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.