Sefton Metropolitan Borough Council (25 000 327)

Category : Education > Alternative provision

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 26 Aug 2025

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: Mrs M complained the Council took too long to arrange alternative education for her daughter. There is not enough injustice to justify an investigation.

The complaint

  1. Mrs M complains the Council took too long to arrange alternative education for her daughter, G. G last attended school on 5 February 2025.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. We investigate complaints about ‘maladministration’ and ‘service failure’, which we call ‘fault’. We must also consider whether any fault has had an adverse impact on the person making the complaint, which we call ‘injustice’. We do not start or continue an investigation if we decide:
  • any injustice is not significant enough to justify our involvement, or
  • there is no worthwhile outcome achievable by our investigation.

(Local Government Act 1974, section 24A(6), as amended, section 34(B))

  1. We cannot investigate most complaints about what happens in schools. (Local Government Act 1974, Schedule 5, paragraph 5(2), as amended)

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information provided by Mrs M and the Council.
  2. I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. Between 5 February and 10 March 2025, Mrs M dealt with G’s school. We cannot investigate complaints about the school.
  2. Mrs M contacted the Council’s children missing education team on 10 March 2025. She wanted the Council to arrange alternative education. The Council suggested a meeting with the school.
  3. On 26 March 2025, the Council made enquiries.
  4. On 25 April 2025, the Council agreed to arrange alternative education for G.
  5. Alternative provision began on 12 May 2025.
  6. Mrs M believes G should have received alternative provision much sooner.
  7. The Council took approximately six weeks to arrange alternative provision once it became clear Mrs M and the school could not resolve their differences. This included the Easter school holidays. The injustice from any delay there may have been is not significant enough to justify our involvement, and there is no worthwhile outcome achievable.
  8. Mrs M tells me the alternative provision ended in June. She is increasingly concerned for G’s welfare and says she has asked the Council to arrange accommodation. I cannot consider these matters because they happened after the Council’s final response. Mrs M could complain to the Council. The Council must have an opportunity to respond first.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We will not investigate Mrs M’s complaint because there is not enough injustice to justify an investigation.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings