Brighton & Hove City Council (24 019 936)

Category : Education > Alternative provision

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 21 Apr 2025

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We will not investigate Ms X’s complaint about a remedy offered for missed education provision. We are unlikely to achieve significantly more.

The complaint

  1. Ms X says the Council has not offered enough compensation for her child missing 14 months of education.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. We investigate complaints about ‘maladministration’ and ‘service failure’, which we call ‘fault’. We must also consider whether any fault has had an adverse impact on the person making the complaint, which we call ‘injustice’. We provide a free service, but must use public money carefully. We do not start or continue an investigation if we decide:
  • we could not add to any previous investigation by the organisation; or
  • further investigation would not lead to a different outcome; or
  • we cannot achieve the outcome someone wants. (Local Government Act 1974, section 24A(6), as amended, section 34(B))
  1. We cannot investigate a complaint if someone has appealed to a tribunal about the same matter. We also cannot investigate a complaint if in doing so we would overlap with the role of a tribunal to decide something which has been or could have been referred to it to resolve using its own powers. (Local Government Act 1974, section 26(6)(a), as amended)

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information provided by Ms X which includes the Council’s reply to her.
  2. I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. Ms X’s child, B was excluded from school in the Autumn of 2023. The Council accepts B was out of school from mid December. The Council says it issued a new Education Health and Care Plan (EHC Plan) in February 2024 before B’s transition to a different phase of education in September 2024. Ms X appealed the EHC Plan in March 2024 and the Tribunal ended in June 2024.
  2. Ms X complained to the Council about the lack of education provided to B for 14 months. The Council in reply offered £14105.50. Ms X says this is not enough.
  3. We cannot investigate whether the EHC Plan issued in February 2024 was suitable for B’s needs because Ms X appealed to the Tribunal. We also may not be able to look at the education provided during the appeal if the education set out in the appealed EHC Plan was available to use.
  4. Our Guidance on Remedies LGO Intranet | Guidance on remedies, sets out how we usually calculate a remedy. The Council’s offer is significantly above the highest point of our range for missed provision. We are unlikely to achieve more.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We will not investigate Ms X’s complaint because we are unlikely to achieve a remedy significantly more than has been offered.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings