West Northamptonshire Council (24 011 234)

Category : Education > Alternative provision

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 11 Dec 2024

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We cannot investigate Miss X’s complaint about the school named in an Education Health and Care Plan because she has appealed to the Tribunal.

The complaint

  1. Miss X says the Council has named the wrong setting in an Education Health and Care Plan (EHC Plan) for her child Y.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. The First-tier Tribunal (Special Educational Needs and Disability) considers appeals against council decisions regarding special educational needs. We refer to it as the SEND Tribunal in this decision statement.
  2. We cannot investigate a complaint if someone has appealed to a tribunal about the same matter. We also cannot investigate a complaint if in doing so we would overlap with the role of a tribunal to decide something which has been or could have been referred to it to resolve using its own powers. (Local Government Act 1974, section 26(6)(a), as amended)

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information provided by Miss X which included the Council’s reply to her.
  2. I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. Y has additional needs. The Council assessed Y’s needs and produced an EHC Plan. A child or young person with special educational needs may have an EHC Plan. This document sets out the child’s needs and what arrangements should be made to meet them. The EHC Plan is set out in sections. We cannot direct changes to the sections about their needs, education, or the name of the educational placement. Only the Tribunal or the Council can do this. 
  2. Miss X says the EHC Plan names the wrong school. She says the school named cannot meet Y’s needs. She says the school has confirmed this. She says she will not send Y to the named school as it cannot meet their needs.
  3. Miss X has appealed the EHC Plan to the Tribunal. She says if the Council had carried out its assessment properly the EHC Plan would name a different setting and she would not need to appeal.
  4. We cannot investigate why the Council named the school in the EHC Plan because she has appealed to the Tribunal. The courts have established that if someone has appealed to the Tribunal, the law says we cannot investigate any matter which was part of, was connected to, or could have been part of, the appeal to the Tribunal. (R (on application of Milburn) v Local Government and Social Care Ombudsman [2023] EWCA Civ 207).

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We cannot investigate Miss X’s complaint because she has appealed to the Tribunal.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings