Suffolk County Council (24 011 021)

Category : Education > Alternative provision

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 12 Dec 2024

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We will not investigate Mrs X’s complaint about the Council failing to provide a sufficient personal budget that would enable the family to deliver the bespoke education other than at school package as outlined in her child’s education, health and care plan. This is because an investigation would not lead to any worthwhile outcomes.

The complaint

  1. Mrs X complains the Council failed to provide a sufficient personal budget that would enable the family to deliver the bespoke education other than at school (EOTAS) package as outlined in her child’s education, health and care (EHC) plan.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. We investigate complaints about ‘maladministration’ and ‘service failure’, which we call ‘fault’. We must also consider whether any fault has had an adverse impact on the person making the complaint, which we call ‘injustice’. We provide a free service, but must use public money carefully. We do not start an investigation if we decide there is no worthwhile outcome achievable by our investigation. (Local Government Act 1974, section 24A(6), as amended, section 34(B))

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information provided by the complainant and the Council.
  2. I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. Mrs X’s child has an EHC plan. Mrs X says the personal budget allocated is not sufficient for her to deliver her child’s EOTAS package.
  2. In response to our enquiries, the Council confirmed it met with Mrs X to discuss her personal budget request and to gather further information about how each part supported the provision as set out in the EHC plan. During the meeting, the Council completed the revised personal budget request with Mrs X and submitted it to the relevant panel for consideration.
  3. An investigation is not justified because it would not lead to any worthwhile outcomes. This is because the Council said the panel reviewed the personal budget request, agreed it, and backdated the payment to September 2024.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We will not investigate Mrs X’s complaint because an investigation would not lead to any worthwhile outcomes.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings