Surrey County Council (26 013 699)

Category : Children's care services > Other

Decision : Upheld

Decision date : 06 Sep 2026

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about the Council’s delay in administering the children’s statutory complaint procedure. The Council has acknowledged the delay and has agreed to remedy the injustice caused by it.

The complaint

  1. Mrs X complains the Council has not provided a stage two complaint response under the statutory children’s complaint procedure in time.
  2. This has caused Mrs X and her family prolonged stress and uncertainty. She says this has left her child without education provision and appropriate safeguarding support.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. We investigate complaints about ‘maladministration’ and ‘service failure’. In this statement, I have used the word fault to refer to these. We provide a free service but must use public money carefully. We may decide not to start or continue with an investigation if we are satisfied with the actions an organisation has taken or proposes to take. (Local Government Act 1974, section 24A(7), as amended)

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information provided by Mrs X and the Council.
  2. I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. This assessment considers the delay in complaint handling only, not the matters included in the complaint. These are still subject to the Council’s consideration under the statutory children’s complaint process.
  2. Mrs X asked the Council to consider her complaint at stage two of the statutory children’s process in May 2026. The Council first declined to consider the complaint at stage two but reversed this decision and accepted the complaint on the same day.
  3. The Council should have completed the stage two response within 65 working days, concluding during August 2026. The Council advised Mrs X it has had difficulty in appointing independent officer to carry out the stage two investigation. Mrs X complained to us in August 2026, after the 65 working day deadline had passed.
  4. The Council has now appointed an investigating officer and independent person.
  5. If we investigated, it is likely we would find fault with the Council for delay completing the stage two investigation. However, the Council has agreed to take action which provides a suitable remedy for the injustice caused.

Back to top

Agreed action

  1. Within one month of this decision, the Council will:
    • start the stage two investigation, and complete it within the 65-day timescale; and
    • pay Mrs X £50 to recognise the distress caused by its delay beyond the original deadline.
  2. The Council confirmed it will consider a remedy for any further delay in its response to the stage two investigation report.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We will not investigate Mrs X’s complaint because the Council has acknowledged the delay and has agreed to remedy the injustice caused by it. Further investigation by us would therefore not be proportionate.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings