London Borough of Havering (25 020 443)

Category : Children's care services > Other

Decision : Upheld

Decision date : 02 Jan 2026

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about delays in the Council’s response to a statutory complaint. The Council has upheld the complaint and agreed to remedy Ms X’s injustice by making a recognition payment. Further investigation by us would therefore not be proportionate.

The complaint

  1. Ms X complained the Council had failed to issue a stage two response to her statutory complaint within required timeframes. She said the council was causing ongoing distress by failing to deal with the matter.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. We investigate complaints about ‘maladministration’ and ‘service failure’, which we call ‘fault’. We must also consider whether any fault has had an adverse impact on the person making the complaint, which we call ‘injustice’. We provide a free service, but must use public money carefully. We do not start or continue an investigation if we decide there is no worthwhile outcome achievable by our investigation.

(Local Government Act 1974, section 24A(6), as amended, section 34(B))

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information provided by the complainant and the Council.
  2. I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. Ms X complained the Council had not provided a stage two response to her statutory complaint, more than 65 working days after she had requested it.
  2. If we investigated this complaint, it is likely we would find the Council at fault because it has accepted there is a delay.
  3. We therefore asked the Council to consider remedying the injustice caused to Ms X by making a payment of £50 for each month of delay, to resolve the complaint early.

Back to top

Agreed action

  1. To its credit, the Council agreed to resolve the complaint and will make a payment to Ms X within one month of the decision to put things right. It will also issue its stage two response.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We have upheld this complaint because the Council has agreed to resolve the complaint early by providing a proportionate remedy for the injustice caused to Ms X.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings