Hertfordshire County Council (25 019 484)

Category : Children's care services > Other

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 28 Apr 2026

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We will not investigate Miss X’s complaint about the Council’s handling of her child’s care placement. The matters were raised in Court. There is not enough evidence of fault in the Council’s refusal of her complaint.

The complaint

  1. Miss X complains about the Council’s handling of her child’s care placement. She says the Council did not follow correct procedures and placed her child in unsafe care. She also complains about mishandlings in the parenting assessments and contact arrangements with her child.
  2. Miss X says the matter has caused her distress and impacted her relationship with her child. She wants the Council to acknowledge the impact on her and to apologise to her. She also wants the Council to investigate her child’s care placement.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. We investigate complaints about ‘maladministration’ and ‘service failure’, which we call ‘fault’. We must also consider whether any fault has had an adverse impact on the person making the complaint, which we call ‘injustice’. We provide a free service but must use public money carefully. We do not start or continue an investigation if we decide there is not enough evidence of fault to justify investigating. (Local Government Act 1974, section 24A(6), as amended, section 34(B))
  2. We have the power to start or end an investigation into a complaint about actions the law allows us to investigate. We may decide not to start or continue with an investigation if we think the issues could reasonably be, or have been mentioned as part of the legal proceedings regarding a closely related matter. (Local Government Act 1974, sections 24A(6) and 34B(8), as amended, section 34(B))

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information provided by Miss X and the Council.
  2. I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. The Council refused to consider Miss X’s complaint due to ongoing related Court proceedings at the time. It instead directed Miss X to raise her concerns to the Court, either directly or through her legal representative.
  2. Since Miss X complained to us, those court proceedings have ended. The Council has advised that her concerns were raised and addressed in Court and that it has not received further complaints from Miss X about this matter.
  3. Councils can refuse complaints if it could prejudice a concurrent investigation, including Court proceedings. Therefore, I consider it was open to the Council to refuse Miss X’s complaint at the time and there is not enough evidence of fault on this point to justify us investigating.
  4. As Miss X’s concerns were raised and addressed in Court, further investigation by us is not warranted.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We will not investigate Miss X’s complaint because the matters were raised in Court and because there is not enough evidence of fault in the Council’s refusal of her complaint.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings