Dudley Metropolitan Borough Council (25 010 349)

Category : Children's care services > Other

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 07 Jan 2026

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We will not investigate Mr X’s complaint about how the Council failed to provide him with a copy of an apology letter. This is because further investigation would not lead to a different outcome.

The complaint

  1. Mr X complained the Council did not provide him with a copy of an apology letter as part of its complaint response to him. He said the Council’s failure to meet his needs had caused him emotional distress. He would like the Council to recognise his request and provide him with a copy of the apology letter, and to be provided with a guarantee he will not face a similar problem again.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. We investigate complaints about ‘maladministration’ and ‘service failure’, which we call ‘fault’. We must also consider whether any fault has had an adverse impact on the person making the complaint, which we call ‘injustice’. We provide a free service, but must use public money carefully. We do not start or continue an investigation if we decide further investigation would not lead to a different outcome. (Local Government Act 1974, section 24A(6), as amended, section 34(B))

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information provided by Mr X and the Council.
  2. I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. Mr X complained to the Council in May 2025 about how it had not met his communication needs.
  2. In its complaint response in July 2025, the Council partially upheld Mr X’s complaint and apologised that some of his interactions with the Council had not been in line with his communications statement. The Council also apologised for the delay in sharing Mr X’s communication statement within the Council. The Council referenced a separate apology letter to Mr X from a staff member regarding Mr X’s communication preferences.
  3. Mr X complained he did not receive this separate apology letter in July 2025.
  4. In response to our enquiries, the Council confirmed that it had sent the separate apology letter to Mr X in December 2025 and apologised to Mr X for the delay.
  5. We will not investigate this complaint. The Council has now provided a copy of the separate apology letter to Mr X, and it apologised for the delay. This apology is an appropriate remedy for Mr X’s uncertainty about the delay. Further investigation would not lead to a different outcome.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We will not investigate Mr X’s complaint because further investigation would not lead to a different outcome.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings