London Borough of Wandsworth (25 007 113)

Category : Children's care services > Other

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 15 Sep 2025

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We will not investigate Mrs X’s complaint that the Council’s children’s services failed to advocate for her child to remain on roll at school. This is because the actions of the Council’s children’s services did not cause the injustice that Mrs X describes.

The complaint

  1. Mrs X complains that the Council’s children’s services failed to advocate for her son to remain on roll at school. Mrs X says this meant her son has gone without education causing distress and regression. Mrs X also complains about poor communication.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. We investigate complaints about ‘maladministration’ and ‘service failure’, which we call ‘fault’. We must also consider whether any fault has had an adverse impact on the person making the complaint, which we call ‘injustice’. We provide a free service but must use public money carefully. We do not start or continue an investigation if we decide:
  • any fault has not caused injustice to the person who complained, or
  • any injustice is not significant enough to justify our involvement.

(Local Government Act 1974, section 24A(6), as amended, section 34(B))

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information provided by the complainant.
  2. I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. I will not investigate Mrs X’s complaint because the injustice she describes was not caused by the actions of the Council’s children’s services. Decisions around her child’s education are matters to be determined by schools, the Council’s Special Educational Needs and Disabilities (SEND) service and the SEND Tribunal.
  2. We have a separate complaint from Mrs X to consider the actions of the Council’s SEND service in relation to its decision making around her child being removed from the schools roll and this will consider any potential injustice caused by these decisions to either Mrs X or her child.
  3. I will not investigate Mrs X’s complaint about poor communication by the Council’s children’s service. Whilst I acknowledge poor communication can cause a certain level of frustration, I do not consider that this alone constitutes a significant enough injustice to warrant investigation.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We will not investigate Mrs X’s complaint because the actions of the Council’s children’s services did not cause the injustice that Mrs X describes

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings