Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about the Council’s handling of a Child in Need plan, the work of its social workers and its complaints process. The Council has already investigated under the children’s statutory complaint procedures, apologised for delayed complaint handling, therefore further investigation by us would not lead to a different outcome.

The complaint

1. Mr X said the Council had not fully addressed his substantive concerns after his contact with Children’s Social Care, after it investigated his complaint through the children’s statutory complaint procedures. He was also unhappy it did not comply with the relevant deadline at the second stage of the procedure. Mr X said the Council’s actions caused him distress.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

2. We investigate complaints about ‘maladministration’ and ‘service failure’, which we call ‘fault’. We must also consider whether any fault has had an adverse impact on the person making the complaint, which we call ‘injustice’. We provide a free service but must use public money carefully. We do not start or continue an investigation if we decide further investigation would not lead to a different outcome. (Local Government Act 1974, section 24A(6), as amended, section 34(B))

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

3. I considered information provided by the complainant and the Council.
4. I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

5. Mr X made a complaint after his contact with the Council relating to Child in Need (CIN) plans and lack of contact with social workers. The Council considered his complaint through the children’s statutory complaint procedure.
6. Mr X said the Council had not fully resolved his concerns, and he was unhappy with the outcome.
7. If a complaint has already been through the three-stage Children Act complaints procedure, this means the complainant has already had access to an independent investigation and we are unlikely to re-investigate unless the earlier investigation was significantly flawed.
8. I have read the documents from Mr X’s complaint, including the independent stage two reports along with the Council’s adjudication, and the stage three panel report, together with the Council’s final response. The Council has apologised for delays at stage two of its complaint process and that is appropriate.
9. Additionally, the stage two investigator also overturned an earlier finding at stage one. Given there are no significant flaws in the investigation and the Council’s responses, and the investigation report has considered Mr X’s comments and referred to case records, I am satisfied the Council has adequately investigated his complaint. I am also satisfied the Council has remedied any injustice to Mr X caused by delays in the procedure.
10. Because we will not reinvestigate the substantive issues Mr X is concerned about, and there is no remaining injustice to be remedied, we will not investigate, because further investigation by us, is unlikely to result in a different outcome for Mr X.

Back to top

Final decision

11. We will not investigate Mr X’s complaint because further investigation would not lead to a different outcome.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman