Kent County Council (24 022 885)

Category : Children's care services > Other

Decision : Upheld

Decision date : 01 Jun 2025

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We have upheld Miss X’s complaint because the Council failed to consider her complaint under the statutory children’s complaints procedure. The Council has agreed to resolve the complaint early by providing a proportionate remedy for the injustice caused to Miss X.

The complaint

  1. Miss X complained the Council’s children’s services team should have treated her as a child in care at the time of its involvement.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. We investigate complaints about ‘maladministration’ and ‘service failure’. In this statement, I have used the word fault to refer to these. We provide a free service but must use public money carefully. We may decide not to start or continue with an investigation if we are satisfied with the actions an organisation has taken or proposes to take. (Local Government Act 1974, section 24A(7), as amended)
  2. Under our information sharing agreement, we will share this decision with the Office for Standards in Education, Children’s Services and Skills (Ofsted).

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information provided by Miss X and the Council.
  2. I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. Miss X complained to the Council that she was made a child in need when she should have been classed as a child in care. The Council responded in November 2024 through its corporate complaints process.
  2. If we investigated this complaint, it is likely we would find the Council at fault, because the Council did not investigate this complaint through the children’s statutory complaint process.
  3. We therefore asked the Council to consider remedying the injustice caused by its actions, by progressing the complaint to stage two of the statutory complaints process. We also asked the Council to apologise to Miss X for not doing so sooner. To its credit the Council agreed to our proposal.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We have upheld this complaint because the Council failed to consider a complaint under the statutory children’s complaints procedure. To its credit, the Council has agreed to resolve the complaint early by providing a proportionate remedy for the injustice caused to Miss X and investigating the complaint through the correct process.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings